IT & ERP Consulting: Industry Trends
By Andrew Karasev

1-866-528-0577, 1-630-961-5918,
help@albaspectrum.com
Alba Spectrum Technologies
IT/ERP/MRP consulting
industry is currently under the transformation. This process is usually
happening and comes in parallel with new economic recovery and change in the
business paradigm. We’ll try to appeal to historical excurse and give some
hints on the future trends. In our case we work with such products as Microsoft
Business Solutions Great Plains, CRM, Navision, Retail Management System (RMS)
and cross integrations between them and non-Microsoft products: Oracle, Lotus
Notes Domino, Unix & Java platforms: J2EE, EJB, Bea Weblogic, Websphere, etc. Let’s look at the history
and the current processes:
- Classical Business
Consulting. It was flourishing
back in 1950th and had two major schools or directions. It was the
time when large businesses were trying to deal with the dilemma of growth and
efficiency of internal document workflow. If you remember – in that time
computers didn’t exist and everything was recorded on the paper. Plus it was
the need to probe and deploy psychological methods of coordinating
headquarters personnel: sales, purchasing, finance and accounting departments
to work in synch with one another under the condition of paper document
workflow
- ERP System of 1960th.
This was the time of mainframe and first ERP. If you look at the ERP
application, it has GL, AP, AR modules – these are classical and could be
tracked back to the 19th century. When you automate Sales Order
Processing or Purchase Order Processing – this would be something new and each
ERP vendor would be doing it as its own invention. ERP Systems implementation
faced the challenge of user experience lack in those days – this is why we see
large number of flourishing ERP consulting firms in late 1960th and
1970th.
- ERP with rich
functionality 1980th & 1990th.
Looking back to 1980th – the typical large and midsize corporation
had relatively similar business processes in Sales, Purchasing, Inventory
Control, Warehouse Management, Logistics, Shipping & Receiving, Manufacturing,
Accounting and Finance departments. When we talk about similarity – we are
comparing it to the diversification of late 1990th and 2000th
when a lot of new companies grew up and went public. The market conditions of
1980th and early 1990th made it feasible to design the
systems with rich functionality. From the ERP side we would name: SAP,
Oracle, PeopleSoft, JDEdwards. These systems cost several hundred thousand
dollars in software licenses and the implementation of the system requires
comparable budget.
- Business Models
Diversification 2000th.
If you look at the dot-com boom of late 1990th – you will see that
these companies tried to invent their own way of business processes to
automate serving their unique business offer to the potential clientele,
usually related to the new opportunities of internet marketing & sales. In
the case of these new public (plus small & micro cap) rapidly growing
companies – business processes were in the turbulent change and the deployment
of the system with rich functionality (usually with long implementation cycle)
would not be the option.
- Customization &
Integration. As the alternative
– new large and midsize businesses have to deploy standard functionality ERP
system (not rich functionality ERP) and consider it as a platform for
customization, custom development, reporting and integration. These standard
functionality systems are the ERP applications of the middle market: Microsoft
Great Plains, Navision, Axapta, Accpac, MAS90, etc. In our opinion – future
business paradigm makes it non feasible to purchase high-end ERP system for
midsize and even large corporation.
Andrew Karasev is Chief Technology Officer
at Alba Spectrum Technologies (
http://www.albaspectrum.com ) - Microsoft Business Solutions and IBM Lotus
Domino Partner, serving corporate customers in the following industries:
Aerospace & Defense, Medical & Healthcare, Distribution & Logistics, Wholesale &
Retail, Chemicals, Oil & Gas, Placement & Recruiting, Publishing, Textile,
Pharmaceutical, Non-Profit, Beverages, Conglomerates, Apparels, Durables,
Manufacturing and having locations in multiple states and internationally.